Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Quadro FX 3800
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro FX 3800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU stacks up against Quadro FX 3800, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 3800
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 666% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 433% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 2700% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1150% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1033% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 82% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 28 May 2019 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 64 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 360
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7790
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 360
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 7790
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs GeForce GT 440
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600