Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Quadro K1000M

When comparing Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU Check Price

Quadro K1000M Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro K1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro K1000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU or Quadro K1000M here:

Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU Laptops

Quadro K1000M Laptops

Main Specs

	Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU	Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)		45 Watt
Interface		MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type	DDR4	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Display Connectors		No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is used in Laptops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	0−1
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	1−2
medium / 1080p	16−18	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	5−6	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	45−50	0−1
medium / 1080p	24−27	−
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p	200−210	60−65
medium / 768p	170−180	27−30
ultra / 1080p	90−95	7−8
QHD / 1440p	50−55	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	130−140	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	0−1
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p	100−110	45−50
medium / 768p	90−95	10−11
ultra / 1080p	60−65	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 237% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	0−1
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	90−95	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 318% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	24−27	0−1
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	0−1
medium / 1080p	24−27	0−1
low / 768p	80−85	18−20
medium / 768p	70−75	−
high / 1080p	27−30	0−1
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	9−10	−
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	27−30	0−1
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
low / 720p	50−55	8−9
medium / 1080p	21−24	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	24−27	0−1
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
low / 768p	50−55	0−1
medium / 768p	30−35	−
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 768p	100−105	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	14−16
ultra / 1080p	30−35	0−1
high / 768p	50−55	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

	Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU	Quadro K1000M
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	Kepler
Code name	Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11	N14P-Q1
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	28 May 2019	1 June 2012
Pipelines	64	192
Core clock speed	300 MHz	850 MHz
Boost Clock	1100 MHz
Transistor count		1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate		13.60
Floating-point performance		326.4 gflops
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-
DirectX	DirectX 12_1	12 (11_0)
Shader Model		5.1
OpenGL		4.6
OpenCL		1.2
Vulkan		1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		10 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Optimus		+
Quick Sync	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Quadro K1000M

Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro K1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares