Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Quadro K2000M
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro K2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro K2000M.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro K2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro K2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU or Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
1−2
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
12−14
medium / 1080p
16−18
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
4−5
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
45−50
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
200−210
120−130
medium / 768p
170−180
90−95
ultra / 1080p
90−95
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
18−20
high / 768p
130−140
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
100−110
70−75
medium / 768p
90−95
45−50
ultra / 1080p
60−65
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
2−3
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
4K / 2160p
5−6
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
10−12
medium / 1080p
16−18
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
10−11
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
2−3
low / 720p
90−95
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
80−85
40−45
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−12
2−3
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
1−2
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
5−6
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
6−7
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
12−14
medium / 768p
30−35
8−9
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
100−105
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
16−18
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Kepler
Code name
Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
N14P-Q3
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
28 May 2019
1 June 2012
Pipelines
64
384
Core clock speed
300 MHz
745 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
23.84
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
