Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 28 May 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 64 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 360
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7790
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon R7 360
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon HD 7790
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M