Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Tesla C2075
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
200−210
210−220
medium / 768p
170−180
190−200
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
90−95
110−120
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
10−11
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 24% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
70−75
80−85
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
100−105
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
28 May 2019
25 July 2011
Pipelines
64
448
Core clock speed
300 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
