FirePro M5950 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M5950 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M5950 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 28% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
9−10
ultra / 1080p
2−3
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
6−7
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro M5950 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
160−170
medium / 768p
95−100
130−140
ultra / 1080p
45−50
65−70
QHD / 1440p
27−30
35−40
4K / 2160p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
70−75
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
70−75
ultra / 1080p
30−33
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
6−7
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
7−8
−
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 41% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 54% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
40−45
55−60
high / 1080p
8−9
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
3−4
6−7
ultra / 1080p
1−2
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
9−10
18−20
medium / 1080p
5−6
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
75−80
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 17% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
9−10
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
20−22
30−35
medium / 768p
12−14
21−24
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
50−55
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FirePro M5950.
Full Specs
FirePro M5950
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Terascale 2
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
Whistler-XT
Haswell GT3e
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
13 April 2011
5 June 2013
Pipelines
480
40
Core clock speed
725 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
17.40
52.00
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
67 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
MXM-A
Check Price
Check Price
