FirePro S7000 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 677% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 750 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 121% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 129% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 118% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | Pitcairn | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 270
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon RX 550X
- FirePro S7000 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book