FirePro S9050 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When comparing FirePro S9050 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9050 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro S9050 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 116 GB more memory, than FirePro S9050.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 700 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
24−27
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
27−30
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
230−240
160−170
medium / 768p
200−210
130−140
ultra / 1080p
110−120
65−70
QHD / 1440p
85−90
35−40
4K / 2160p
45−50
27−30
high / 768p
160−170
100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
24−27
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
medium / 768p
100−110
70−75
ultra / 1080p
80−85
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−11
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
24−27
medium / 1080p
27−30
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
30−35
18−20
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
70−75
medium / 1080p
70−75
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 85% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
QHD / 1440p
12−14
3−4
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 105% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
60−65
medium / 768p
90−95
55−60
high / 1080p
40−45
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
40−45
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
20−22
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
70−75
30−35
medium / 768p
45−50
21−24
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
40−45
24−27
high / 768p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
Tahiti
Haswell GT3e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
7 August 2014
5 June 2013
Pipelines
1792
40
Core clock speed
900 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
52.00
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.80
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
full height / full length
Check Price
Check Price