FirePro W7000 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between FirePro W7000 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7000 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7000
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W7000 has 677% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
FirePro W7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than FirePro W7000.
FirePro W7000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
FirePro W7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 750 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
FirePro W7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
24−27
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 108% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
27−30
12−14
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
230−240
160−170
medium / 768p
200−210
130−140
ultra / 1080p
120−130
65−70
QHD / 1440p
90−95
35−40
4K / 2160p
50−55
27−30
high / 768p
170−180
100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
24−27
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
medium / 768p
100−110
70−75
ultra / 1080p
80−85
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−11
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
24−27
medium / 1080p
27−30
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
30−35
18−20
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
120−130
70−75
medium / 1080p
70−75
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Fortnite is 85% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
27−30
14−16
QHD / 1440p
14−16
3−4
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
70−75
30−35
medium / 1080p
40−45
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 129% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
60−65
medium / 768p
95−100
55−60
high / 1080p
40−45
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 80% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
40−45
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Metro Exodus is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
16−18
medium / 1080p
21−24
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
75−80
30−35
medium / 768p
45−50
21−24
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
40−45
24−27
high / 768p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
FirePro W7000
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
Pitcairn
Haswell GT3e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
13 June 2012
5 June 2013
Pipelines
1280
40
Core clock speed
950 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
76.00
52.00
Floating-point performance
2,432 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
242 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.80
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
285 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
6 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price
