FireStream 9270 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 255% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 91% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | RV770 | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 930MX
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs Radeon RX 550X
- FireStream 9270 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book