GeForce 820A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

When comparing GeForce 820A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 820A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce 820A

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce 820A	Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type	DDR3	eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	128 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 575 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	21−24
medium / 1080p	0−1	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce 820A.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p	60−65	160−170
medium / 768p	27−30	130−140
ultra / 1080p	7−8	65−70
QHD / 1440p	−	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	16−18	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than GeForce 820A.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	10−11	70−75
ultra / 1080p	0−1	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than GeForce 820A.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	70−75
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce 820A.
high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	0−1	18−20
low / 768p	18−20	60−65
medium / 768p	−	55−60
high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce 820A.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	−	8−9
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
high / 1080p	27−30	95−100
ultra / 1080p	−	85−90
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 90% more, than GeForce 820A.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce 820A.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	0−1	30−35
medium / 768p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	50−55
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
high / 768p	12−14	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 820A.

Full Specs

	GeForce 820A	Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name	GF117	Haswell GT3e
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	17 March 2014	5 June 2013
Pipelines	96	40
Core clock speed	775 MHz	200 MHz
Boost Clock		1300 MHz
Transistor count	585 million	392 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Texture fill rate	12.40	52.00
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	104.0 gflops
Memory bus width	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.80
CUDA	2.1
Laptop size		medium sized
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GeForce 820A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares