GeForce 920M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920M stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 5200, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 920M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 920M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type
DDR3
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than GeForce 920M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 754 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
160−170
medium / 768p
27−30
130−140
ultra / 1080p
7−8
65−70
QHD / 1440p
−
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than GeForce 920M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
10−11
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
70−75
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
18−20
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
27−30
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 90% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce 920M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
0−1
30−35
medium / 768p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
50−55
ultra / 1080p
0−1
24−27
high / 768p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 920M.
Full Specs
GeForce 920M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
N16V-GM-S
Haswell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
27 January 2015
5 June 2013
Pipelines
384
40
Core clock speed
954 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
52.00
Floating-point performance
297.6 gflops
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
40 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
Check Price
Check Price