GeForce 930A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between GeForce 930A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 930A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce 930A
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 930A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce 930A.
- GeForce 930A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce 930A.
- GeForce 930A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 930A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930A is 728 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce 930A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 930A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 930A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 47% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 81% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 31% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce 930A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce 930A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 930A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GM108 | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.58 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 930A vs GeForce GTS 450
- GeForce 930A vs Radeon HD 6770
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTS 450
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 6770
- GeForce 930A vs Radeon RX 550X
- GeForce 930A vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book