GeForce GT 440 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between GeForce GT 440 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 440 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 440
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GT 440 has 44% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GT 440 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GT 440 has 384 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GT 440 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GT 440 is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 440 is 1420 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GT 440 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 440 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
160−170
medium / 768p
27−30
130−140
ultra / 1080p
7−8
65−70
QHD / 1440p
−
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than GeForce GT 440.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 440 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
10−11
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
70−75
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
18−20
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
27−30
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 90% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
0−1
30−35
medium / 768p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
50−55
ultra / 1080p
0−1
24−27
high / 768p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce GT 440.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 440
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GF108
Haswell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
1 February 2011
5 June 2013
Pipelines
96
40
Core clock speed
1620 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
585 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
13.0 billion/sec
52.00
Floating-point performance
311.04 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
20 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Standard memory config per GPU
1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Check Price
Check Price