GeForce GT 640 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GeForce GT 640 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 640 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 640
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GT 640 has 44% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GT 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640.
GeForce GT 640 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GT 640 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 640 is 702 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
1−2
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
5−6
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
30−35
medium / 1080p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
110−120
160−170
medium / 768p
90−95
130−140
ultra / 1080p
45−50
65−70
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
65−70
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
70−75
ultra / 1080p
27−30
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
4K / 2160p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
4−5
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
10−12
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
−
low / 720p
50−55
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
2−3
6−7
ultra / 1080p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
18−20
medium / 1080p
4−5
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
70−75
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 24% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
14−16
30−35
medium / 768p
10−11
21−24
high / 1080p
5−6
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GT 640.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 640
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GK107
Haswell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2012
5 June 2013
Pipelines
384
40
Core clock speed
902 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
28.86
52.00
Floating-point performance
692.7 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
145 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
