GeForce GT 645M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 645M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 645M stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 5200, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GT 645M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GT 645M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 645M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
32 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type
DDR3\GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 40% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
GeForce GT 645M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
2−3
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 185% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
110−120
160−170
medium / 768p
85−90
130−140
ultra / 1080p
35−40
65−70
QHD / 1440p
−
35−40
4K / 2160p
10−11
27−30
high / 768p
60−65
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
10−11
24−27
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
−
low / 720p
45−50
70−75
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 95% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
40−45
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
3−4
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 87% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
1−2
6−7
ultra / 1080p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
3−4
18−20
medium / 1080p
2−3
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
55−60
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 40% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
8−9
30−35
medium / 768p
7−8
21−24
high / 1080p
3−4
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
high / 768p
30−33
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 645M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
N13P-GS
Haswell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
22 March 2012
5 June 2013
Pipelines
384
40
Core clock speed
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
22.7 billion/sec
52.00
Floating-point performance
544.5 gflops
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
3D Blu-Ray
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
19 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price