GeForce GTS 450 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between GeForce GTS 450 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTS 450 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 450
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
106 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 450 has 135% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTS 450 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 450.
GeForce GTS 450 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 450 is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 450 is 1366 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTS 450 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
9−10
ultra / 1080p
1−2
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
5−6
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
8−9
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTS 450 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
160−170
medium / 768p
95−100
130−140
ultra / 1080p
45−50
65−70
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
70−75
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
24−27
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
30−33
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
5−6
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 47% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 81% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
9−10
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
2−3
6−7
ultra / 1080p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
18−20
medium / 1080p
4−5
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
65−70
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 31% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
18−20
30−35
medium / 768p
12−14
21−24
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 450
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GF106
Haswell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
13 September 2010
5 June 2013
Pipelines
192
40
Core clock speed
1566 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
25.1 billion/sec
52.00
Floating-point performance
601.3 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.7 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
40 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
