GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 1330 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 289% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 223% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 305% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 172% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 337% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 318% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | Turing | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | TU117 | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 570
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M6
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 570
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Tesla M6
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 550X
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book