GeForce GTX 670 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between GeForce GTX 670 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 670 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 670 has 277% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 670 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670.
GeForce GTX 670 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 670 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670 is 780 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
9−10
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
40−45
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
55−60
14−16
ultra / 1080p
45−50
12−14
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
30−35
medium / 1080p
60−65
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
250−260
160−170
medium / 768p
220−230
130−140
ultra / 1080p
180−190
65−70
QHD / 1440p
110−120
35−40
4K / 2160p
70−75
27−30
high / 768p
210−220
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
medium / 768p
110−120
70−75
ultra / 1080p
100−110
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
45−50
10−12
ultra / 1080p
40−45
10−11
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
4−5
low / 720p
80−85
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
60−65
18−20
ultra / 1080p
45−50
12−14
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
60−65
16−18
ultra / 1080p
45−50
14−16
QHD / 1440p
30−35
3−4
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
30−35
medium / 1080p
65−70
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
140−150
60−65
medium / 768p
120−130
55−60
high / 1080p
70−75
18−20
ultra / 1080p
30−35
8−9
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Grand Theft Auto V is 158% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
24−27
6−7
ultra / 1080p
20−22
4−5
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
low / 720p
65−70
18−20
medium / 1080p
30−35
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
130−140
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
120−130
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
16−18
medium / 1080p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
130−140
30−35
medium / 768p
85−90
21−24
high / 1080p
45−50
12−14
ultra / 1080p
24−27
7−8
4K / 2160p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
50−55
24−27
high / 768p
60−65
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GK104
Haswell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
10 May 2012
5 June 2013
Pipelines
1344
40
Core clock speed
980 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1300 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
102.5 billion/sec
52.00
Floating-point performance
2,459.5 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
97 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
13 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
