GeForce GTX 750 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 750 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 750 stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 5200, check out specs charts below.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 750
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 750 has 22% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 750 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 750.
GeForce GTX 750 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 750 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 750 is 820 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
27−30
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
50−55
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
220−230
160−170
medium / 768p
190−200
130−140
ultra / 1080p
100−110
65−70
QHD / 1440p
65−70
35−40
4K / 2160p
35−40
27−30
high / 768p
150−160
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
45−50
24−27
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
medium / 768p
100−110
70−75
ultra / 1080p
70−75
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
21−24
10−12
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−11
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
45−50
24−27
medium / 1080p
21−24
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Far Cry 5 is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
27−30
18−20
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
110−120
70−75
medium / 1080p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Fortnite is 67% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
30−33
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
10−11
3−4
low / 720p
60−65
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Forza Horizon 4 is 82% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
95−100
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
55−60
high / 1080p
35−40
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
8−9
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−12
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
30−35
medium / 768p
35−40
21−24
high / 1080p
21−24
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
35−40
24−27
high / 768p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 750
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GM107
Haswell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
18 February 2014
5 June 2013
Pipelines
512
40
Core clock speed
1020 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
34.72
52.00
Floating-point performance
1,111 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
512
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
3 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
143 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price