GeForce GTX 760 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 760 has 277% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 760 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760.
GeForce GTX 760 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 760 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 is 780 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
24−27
9−10
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
45−50
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−35
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
30−35
12−14
QHD / 1440p
18−20
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
75−80
30−35
medium / 1080p
40−45
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Battlefield 5 is 147% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
240−250
160−170
medium / 768p
210−220
130−140
ultra / 1080p
130−140
65−70
QHD / 1440p
100−110
35−40
4K / 2160p
60−65
27−30
high / 768p
180−190
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 76% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
medium / 768p
110−120
70−75
ultra / 1080p
85−90
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Dota 2 is 57% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
30−35
10−12
ultra / 1080p
27−30
10−11
QHD / 1440p
21−24
−
4K / 2160p
9−10
4−5
low / 720p
60−65
24−27
medium / 1080p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
35−40
18−20
ultra / 1080p
30−35
12−14
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
low / 720p
140−150
70−75
medium / 1080p
85−90
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Fortnite is 120% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
40−45
16−18
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
QHD / 1440p
18−20
3−4
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
low / 720p
80−85
30−35
medium / 1080p
45−50
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
110−120
60−65
medium / 768p
100−110
55−60
high / 1080p
45−50
18−20
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
12−14
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
1−2
low / 720p
45−50
18−20
medium / 1080p
21−24
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
80−85
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
45−50
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
30−35
medium / 768p
55−60
21−24
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
4K / 2160p
10−11
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 162% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
45−50
24−27
high / 768p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GK104
Haswell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
25 June 2013
5 June 2013
Pipelines
1152
40
Core clock speed
980 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1300 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
94.1 billion/sec
52.00
Floating-point performance
2,378 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1152
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
83 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3.5 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Blu Ray 3D
+
Minimum recommended system power
500 Watt
PhysX
+
Check Price
Check Price
