GeForce GTX 850A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 850A
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 45 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 702 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GM107 | Haswell GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 392 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 52.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon HD 7670A
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce 840M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7670A
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 840M
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon RX 550X
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book