Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    GeForce GTX 965M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

    In this comparison between GeForce GTX 965M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 965M will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    GeForce GTX 965M Check Price
    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Check Price

    GeForce GTX 965M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: GeForce GTX 965M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:

    GeForce GTX 965M Laptops
    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Laptops

    Main Specs

      GeForce GTX 965M Iris Pro Graphics 5200
    Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt
    Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 1.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type GDDR5 eDRAM
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
    • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 744 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 20−22 9−10
    ultra / 1080p 12−14 5−6
    QHD / 1440p 6−7 0−1
    4K / 2160p 5−6 −
    low / 720p 35−40 21−24
    medium / 1080p 24−27 10−12
    The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

    Full Specs

      GeForce GTX 965M Iris Pro Graphics 5200
    Architecture Maxwell Gen. 7.5 Haswell
    Code name N16E-GS, N16E-GR Haswell GT3e
    Type Laptop Laptop
    Release date 5 January 2015 5 June 2013
    Pipelines 1024 40
    Core clock speed 944 MHz 200 MHz
    Boost Clock 950 / 1151 MHz 1300 MHz
    Transistor count 2,940 million 392 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 22 nm
    Texture fill rate 73.60 52.00
    Floating-point performance 2,355 gflops 104.0 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 2500 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s
    Shared memory - +
    G-SYNC support +
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_1)
    Shader Model 6.4 5.1
    OpenGL 4.5 4.3
    OpenCL 1.1 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1 1.1.80
    CUDA +
    CUDA cores 1024
    Bus support PCI Express 3.0
    SLI options +
    HDMI +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 226 Mh/s
    Laptop size large medium sized
    DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support +
    H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder +
    Optimus +
    Quick Sync +
    GameStream +
    GeForce ShadowPlay +
    GPU Boost 2.0
    GameWorks +
    BatteryBoost +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares