GeForce MX250 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GeForce MX250 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX250 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce MX250 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce MX250 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX250
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
10 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than GeForce MX250.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 1318 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
9−10
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
45−50
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce MX250 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
190−200
160−170
medium / 768p
160−170
130−140
ultra / 1080p
85−90
65−70
QHD / 1440p
50−55
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
120−130
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
85−90
70−75
ultra / 1080p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−11
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
90−95
70−75
medium / 1080p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
7−8
3−4
low / 720p
45−50
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
75−80
60−65
medium / 768p
70−75
55−60
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−12
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
8−9
6−7
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
100−105
85−90
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
30−35
medium / 768p
30−33
21−24
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
high / 768p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
GeForce MX250
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Pascal
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
N17S-G2
Haswell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
20 February 2019
5 June 2013
Pipelines
384
40
Core clock speed
1518 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1582 MHz
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,800 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
24.91
52.00
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
1.1.80
CUDA
6.1
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
