GRID K160Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between GRID K160Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GRID K160Q
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 188% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 650 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K160Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 126% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 257% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 67% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 44% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 56% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 633% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GK107 | Haswell GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 392 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 52.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |