GRID K2 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GRID K2 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K2 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GRID K2
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GRID K2 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GRID K2 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than GRID K2.
GRID K2 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GRID K2 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GRID K2 is 545 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GRID K2 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
9−10
ultra / 1080p
9−10
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
20−22
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
55−60
30−35
medium / 1080p
27−30
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Battlefield 5 is 73% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GRID K2 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
160−170
medium / 768p
180−190
130−140
ultra / 1080p
100−110
65−70
QHD / 1440p
55−60
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−35
27−30
high / 768p
140−150
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
medium / 768p
95−100
70−75
ultra / 1080p
65−70
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
10−12
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−11
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
24−27
medium / 1080p
21−24
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
27−30
18−20
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Fortnite is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
27−30
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
10−11
3−4
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
55−60
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 76% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
60−65
medium / 768p
80−85
55−60
high / 1080p
30−35
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−11
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
40−45
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
30−35
medium / 768p
35−40
21−24
high / 1080p
20−22
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
35−40
24−27
high / 768p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K2 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
GRID K2
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GK104
Haswell GT3e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
11 May 2013
5 June 2013
Pipelines
1536
40
Core clock speed
745 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
52.00
Floating-point performance
2x 2,289 gflops
104.0 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
114 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
