GRID K220Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between GRID K220Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K220Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GRID K220Q
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 384 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 545 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 185% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 95% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 87% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 40% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GK104 | Haswell GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 392 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 52.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |