GRID K240Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

When choosing between GRID K240Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K240Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

GRID K240Q

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	45 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	128 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K240Q has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 545 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	9−10
ultra / 1080p	6−7	5−6
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	21−24
medium / 1080p	12−14	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K240Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	160−170
medium / 768p	140−150	130−140
ultra / 1080p	75−80	65−70
QHD / 1440p	40−45	35−40
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	110−120	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	24−27
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	75−80	70−75
ultra / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p	12−14	10−12
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−11
4K / 2160p	4−5	4−5
low / 720p	27−30	24−27
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p	18−20	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	75−80	70−75
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
QHD / 1440p	4−5	3−4
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
medium / 768p	60−65	55−60
high / 1080p	20−22	18−20
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p	7−8	6−7
ultra / 1080p	5−6	4−5
4K / 2160p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	20−22	18−20
medium / 1080p	9−10	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
high / 1080p	−	95−100
ultra / 1080p	90−95	85−90
medium / 1080p	100−105	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p	18−20	18−20
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	40−45
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	16−18
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p	35−40	30−35
medium / 768p	24−27	21−24
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	50−55	50−55
ultra / 1080p	27−30	24−27
high / 768p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name	GK104	Haswell GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	5 June 2013
Pipelines	1536	40
Core clock speed	745 MHz	200 MHz
Boost Clock		1300 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	392 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	52.00
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	104.0 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.80
CUDA	3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K240Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares