GRID K260Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 545 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 56% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GK104 | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |