GRID K280Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When comparing GRID K280Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K280Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K280Q
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 545 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K280Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 19% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GK104 | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GRID K280Q vs Quadro K3100M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro K3100M
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX 550X
- GRID K280Q vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book