GRID M60 2Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M60 2Q and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GRID M60 2Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 357 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 158% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GM204 | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M60 2Q vs GeForce GTX 670
- GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon HD 7970
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 670
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7970
- GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon RX 550X
- GRID M60 2Q vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book