HD Graphics 5300 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between HD Graphics 5300 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 5300 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics 5300 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: HD Graphics 5300 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 5300
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type
System Shared
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 200% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
HD Graphics 5300 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
HD Graphics 5300 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is 100 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
HD Graphics 5300 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−12
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
HD Graphics 5300 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
160−170
medium / 768p
27−30
130−140
ultra / 1080p
10−11
65−70
QHD / 1440p
−
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
21−24
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 280% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
low / 768p
85−90
55−60
ultra / 1080p
1−2
24−27
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
HD Graphics 5300 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
18−20
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
high / 1080p
0−1
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
70−75
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 227% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
18−20
low / 768p
16−18
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
10−11
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 264% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
high / 1080p
60−65
95−100
ultra / 1080p
45−50
85−90
medium / 1080p
75−80
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
7−8
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 500% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
0−1
30−35
medium / 768p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
12−14
50−55
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
high / 768p
9−10
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 194% more, than HD Graphics 5300.
Full Specs
HD Graphics 5300
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
Broadwell GT2
Haswell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 September 2014
5 June 2013
Pipelines
24
40
Core clock speed
100 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,300 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
52.00
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.3
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.80
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price