Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 1.0 x16
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of Iris Plus Graphics 645 is 100 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
9−10
ultra / 1080p
2−3
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
5−6
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
100−110
160−170
medium / 768p
80−85
130−140
ultra / 1080p
35−40
65−70
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
60−65
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
70−75
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
5−6
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
low / 720p
45−50
70−75
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 70% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
8−9
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
40−45
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
3−4
6−7
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
18−20
medium / 1080p
4−5
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
80−85
95−100
ultra / 1080p
70−75
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
16−18
30−35
medium / 768p
12−14
21−24
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
high / 768p
30−33
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Haswell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
10 July 2019
5 June 2013
Pipelines
48
40
Core clock speed
300 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1300 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
52.00
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.3
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.80
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
