Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type
eDRAM
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is 100 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−12
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
110−120
medium / 768p
130−140
85−90
ultra / 1080p
65−70
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
24−27
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
100−110
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
70−75
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
10−12
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
4K / 2160p
4−5
3−4
low / 720p
24−27
12−14
medium / 1080p
12−14
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
9−10
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 69% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
60−65
40−45
medium / 768p
55−60
35−40
high / 1080p
18−20
8−9
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
3−4
ultra / 1080p
4−5
2−3
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
8−9
medium / 1080p
8−9
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
95−100
80−85
ultra / 1080p
85−90
70−75
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
8−9
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
30−35
16−18
medium / 768p
21−24
12−14
high / 1080p
12−14
7−8
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2013
2 June 2015
Pipelines
40
48
Core clock speed
200 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
40.80
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
883.2 gflops
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.80
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
