Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs P106 090
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and P106 090. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and P106 090. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
P106 090
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | P106 090 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P106 090 has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and P106 090 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 125 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 1154 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | P106 090 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Pascal |
| Code name | Haswell GT3e | GP106 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 31 July 2017 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 73.49 |
| Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 2,352 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |