Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro CX

    If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro CX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 stacks up against Quadro CX, check out specs charts below.
    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Check Price
    Quadro CX

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro CX
    Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 150 Watt
    Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type eDRAM GDDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1536 MB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
      Check Price
    • Quadro CX has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro CX has 1408 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 402 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 9−10 1−2
    ultra / 1080p 5−6 0−1
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 21−24 10−12
    medium / 1080p 10−12 2−3
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than Quadro CX.

    Full Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro CX
    Architecture Gen. 7.5 Haswell Tesla 2.0
    Code name Haswell GT3e GT200B
    Type Laptop Workstation
    Release date 5 June 2013 11 November 2008
    Pipelines 40 192
    Core clock speed 200 MHz 602 MHz
    Boost Clock 1300 MHz
    Transistor count 392 million 1,400 million
    Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 55 nm
    Texture fill rate 52.00 38.53
    Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops 462.3 gflops
    Length 267 mm
    Memory bus width 384 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s
    Shared memory +
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 11.1 (10_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 4.0
    OpenGL 4.3 3.3
    OpenCL 1.2 1.1
    Vulkan 1.1.80 N/A
    CUDA 1.3
    Laptop size medium sized
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price

    Similar compares