Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro FX 4800.
Quadro FX 4800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1408 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 402 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 78% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 40 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 830M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon E6760
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon E6760