Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro K2200
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K2200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K2200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2200 has 51% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro K2200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 846 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
220−230
medium / 768p
130−140
190−200
ultra / 1080p
65−70
110−120
QHD / 1440p
35−40
75−80
4K / 2160p
27−30
40−45
high / 768p
100−110
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
70−75
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
7−8
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−35
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 70% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−35
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−12
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
95−100
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
30−35
65−70
medium / 768p
21−24
40−45
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro K2200
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Maxwell
Code name
Haswell GT3e
GM107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
22 July 2014
Pipelines
40
640
Core clock speed
200 MHz
1046 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1124 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
44.96
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
1,439 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
162 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.6 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
