Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro K3000M
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K3000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K3000M has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 454 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
140−150
medium / 768p
130−140
120−130
ultra / 1080p
65−70
55−60
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
70−75
65−70
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
10−12
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−35
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
95−100
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
30−35
27−30
medium / 768p
21−24
18−20
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Kepler
Code name
Haswell GT3e
N14E-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
1 June 2012
Pipelines
40
576
Core clock speed
200 MHz
654 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
31.39
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
753.4 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
