Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro K4100M
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K4100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K4100M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K4100M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro K4100M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4100M has 122% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than Quadro K4100M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 506 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro K4100M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
180−190
medium / 768p
130−140
150−160
ultra / 1080p
65−70
80−85
QHD / 1440p
35−40
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
70−75
80−85
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−12
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
85−90
medium / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
65−70
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 19% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
95−100
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
30−35
40−45
medium / 768p
21−24
27−30
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−33
high / 768p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro K4100M
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Kepler
Code name
Haswell GT3e
N15E-Q3-A2
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
23 July 2013
Pipelines
40
1152
Core clock speed
200 MHz
706 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
67.78
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
1,627 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
51 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
