Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro M2000M

In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Quadro M2000M here:

Main Specs

  Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 55 Watt
Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type eDRAM GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro M2000M has 22% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 838 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 9−10 18−20
ultra / 1080p 5−6 10−11
QHD / 1440p 0−1 4−5
4K / 2160p 4−5
low / 720p 21−24 35−40
medium / 1080p 10−12 21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

Full Specs

  Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro M2000M
Architecture Gen. 7.5 Haswell Maxwell
Code name Haswell GT3e GM107
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Release date 5 June 2013 2 October 2015
Pipelines 40 640
Core clock speed 200 MHz 1038 MHz
Boost Clock 1300 MHz 1197 MHz
Transistor count 392 million 1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 52.00 43.92
Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops 1,405 gflops
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s
Shared memory + -
DirectX 12 (11_1) 12
Shader Model 5.1 5.0
OpenGL 4.3 4.5
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.80 1.1.126
CUDA 5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 173 Mh/s
Laptop size medium sized large
Optimus +
Quick Sync +
Display Port 1.2
3D Vision Pro +
Mosaic +
nView Display Management +
  Check Price Check Price