Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro M4000

    When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Check Price
    Quadro M4000 Check Price

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:

    Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro M4000
    Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 120 Watt
    Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin
    Memory type eDRAM GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 4x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro M4000 has 166% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 120 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M4000 - in Desktops.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 573 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000 - by 28 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 9−10 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 5−6 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 21−24 60−65
    medium / 1080p 10−12 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

    Full Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Quadro M4000
    Architecture Gen. 7.5 Haswell Maxwell 2.0
    Code name Haswell GT3e GM204
    Type Laptop Workstation
    Release date 5 June 2013 29 June 2015
    Pipelines 40 1664
    Core clock speed 200 MHz 773 MHz
    Boost Clock 1300 MHz
    Transistor count 392 million 5,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 52.00 80.39
    Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops 2,573 gflops
    Length 241 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 6008 MHz
    Shared memory +
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12
    Shader Model 5.1 5
    OpenGL 4.3 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.80 +
    CUDA 5.2
    SLI options +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 299 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Quick Sync +
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    Width 1" (2.5 cm)
    Number of simultaneous displays 4
    nView Desktop Management +
    Multi-display synchronization Quadro Sync
    High-Performance Video I/O6 +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares