Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon 550X
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon 550X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon 550X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon 550X
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon 550X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon 550X has 11% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon 550X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Radeon 550X.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon 550X - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon 550X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 550X is 882 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon 550X - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon 550X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 21% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon 550X. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon 550X | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Lexa |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 27 March 2019 |
Pipelines | 40 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1218 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 38.98 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon 550X vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon 550X vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 285
- Radeon 550X vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Radeon 550X vs GeForce GTX 285