Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon E8860
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon E8860, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon E8860.
Radeon E8860
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon E8860 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 37 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 21% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon E8860 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon E8860 is 375 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon E8860 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 21% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon E8860. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon E8860 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 25 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 40 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon E8860 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon E8860 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro K2000
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Radeon E8860 vs Quadro K2000
- Radeon E8860 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti