Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 5750
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 5750 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 5750 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon HD 5750
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
86 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon HD 5750 has 91% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon HD 5750 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 5750.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 5750 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon HD 5750 - with TeraScale 2.
Core clock speed of Radeon HD 5750 is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 5750 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
3−4
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 5750 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
120−130
medium / 768p
130−140
90−95
ultra / 1080p
65−70
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
24−27
4K / 2160p
27−30
18−20
high / 768p
100−110
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
low / 768p
55−60
80−85
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5750 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
70−75
50−55
ultra / 1080p
40−45
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
high / 1080p
10−12
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
high / 1080p
16−18
7−8
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
20−22
medium / 1080p
18−20
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
−
high / 1080p
18−20
8−9
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
high / 1080p
6−7
3−4
ultra / 1080p
4−5
1−2
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
8−9
medium / 1080p
8−9
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
95−100
85−90
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
8−9
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
low / 768p
30−35
16−18
medium / 768p
21−24
12−14
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
16−18
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon HD 5750.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon HD 5750
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
TeraScale 2
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Juniper
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
5 June 2013
13 October 2009
Pipelines
40
720
Core clock speed
200 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
25.20
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
1,008.0 gflops
Length
178 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
N/A
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
