Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 6850M
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 6850M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6850M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 6850M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 6850M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Radeon HD 6850M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon HD 6850M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Memory type
eDRAM
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon HD 6850M has 11% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6850M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6850M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon HD 6850M - with Terascale 2.
Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6850M is 375 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6850M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−12
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6850M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
120−130
medium / 768p
130−140
95−100
ultra / 1080p
65−70
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
10−11
high / 768p
100−110
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6850M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
70−75
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
high / 1080p
10−12
3−4
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
4K / 2160p
4−5
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
12−14
medium / 1080p
12−14
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
high / 1080p
18−20
10−12
ultra / 1080p
12−14
6−7
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−35
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 70% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
−
high / 1080p
18−20
5−6
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
high / 1080p
6−7
1−2
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
5−6
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
95−100
60−65
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 31% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
low / 768p
30−35
10−12
medium / 768p
21−24
8−9
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
4K / 2160p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
50−55
40−45
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon HD 6850M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon HD 6850M
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Terascale 2
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Granville Pro/LP
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2013
6 January 2011
Pipelines
40
800
Core clock speed
200 MHz
575 / 675 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
27.00
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
1,080.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
N/A
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
