Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7670A
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 7670A, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 stacks up against Radeon HD 7670A, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 7670A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 45 Watt.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 400 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
Pipelines | 40 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 392 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon HD 7670A vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 6750
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 850A
- Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon HD 6750
- Radeon HD 7670A vs GeForce GTX 850A