Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 7690M XT, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 stacks up against Radeon HD 7690M XT, check out specs charts below.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 7690M XT are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 7690M XT are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Radeon HD 7690M XT here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon HD 7690M XT
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
25 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 80% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M XT uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - with Terascale 2.
Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7690M XT is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−12
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
120−130
medium / 768p
130−140
95−100
ultra / 1080p
65−70
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
21−24
4K / 2160p
27−30
16−18
high / 768p
100−110
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
24−27
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
70−75
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
10−12
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−11
2−3
4K / 2160p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
10−12
medium / 1080p
12−14
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
18−20
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
3−4
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−35
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
16−18
5−6
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
−
high / 1080p
18−20
4−5
ultra / 1080p
8−9
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
6−7
2−3
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
4−5
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
95−100
80−85
ultra / 1080p
85−90
70−75
medium / 1080p
95−100
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
16−18
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
30−35
10−11
medium / 768p
21−24
8−9
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon HD 7690M XT
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Terascale 2
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Thames XTX
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
5 June 2013
7 June 2011
Pipelines
40
480
Core clock speed
200 MHz
725 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
716 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
17.40
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
696.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
N/A
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
