Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon Pro 460
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon Pro 460. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon Pro 460. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 28% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 700 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
220−230
medium / 768p
130−140
190−200
ultra / 1080p
65−70
100−110
QHD / 1440p
35−40
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
100−110
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
70−75
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 67% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−33
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−12
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
95−100
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
30−35
60−65
medium / 768p
21−24
40−45
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 81% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Polaris
Code name
Haswell GT3e
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
8 August 2016
Pipelines
40
1024
Core clock speed
200 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
58.05
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
