Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 11% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 530 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 46% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 88% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 24% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT3e | Oland |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620